What Impact Will SEC Dismissal Have On UBS Bond Fraud Victims: I Discuss In Investment News
Today I discuss with Investment News the impact the SEC dismissal of claims against two UBS Puerto Rico employees will have on investors who wish to sue UBS in the FINRA arbitration system. The entire article is cut and pasted below. It can also be viewed at its original source at http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20131031/FREE/131039971?template=printart
Importantly, the 95 page decision provides a road map for us as we draft discovery requests. The level of detail in the complaint, citing specific emails, documents, names and transcripts, provides a sort of light for exposure in discovery, where so many of the FINRA cases are won or lost. In addition, the decision from the SEC Administrative Law Judge only relates to certain, specific misrepresentation and omission claims made by a few employees. The rest of my views are in the article below.
To discover how UBS Puerto Rico bond losses can be recovered through lawsuits or FINRA arbitration claims, please visit http://ubsbondfundfraud.com/ or call us for a no cost review.
Judge dismisses SEC complaint involving UBS Puerto Rico bonds
Plaintiff’s attorney still sees silver lining in decision; plenty of room for arbitration claims
In a win for UBS Financial Services Inc., a Securities and Exchange Commission administrative judge this week dismissed allegations that two leading executives in Puerto Rico committed fraud in 2008 and 2009 when making statements to clients and UBS financial advisers about the quality of Puerto Rican bonds and the market for them.
In May 2012, the SEC accused Miguel Ferrer, senior officer of UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico, and Carlos Ortiz, the head of the firm’s closed-end fund trading desk, of duping thousands of clients into buying hundreds of millions of dollars of municipal debt through closed-end funds created by UBS.
“I do not find the preponderance of the evidence supports the division’s allegation that UBS PR, Ferrer and Ortiz engaged in a fraudulent course of conduct or a scheme to mislead customers and [financial advisers] when they represented the funds as profitable, safe, and stable investments and that supply and demand were responsible for fund prices,” chief administrative law judge Brenda P. Murray wrote in her decision.
Ms. Murray also wrote that UBS Puerto Rico did not make material misstatements or omissions regarding its inability to make a market for the proprietary municipal bond funds, which have declined in value because of Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis, with economic stagnation and huge pension obligations.
UBS has a major presence in the financial advice industry in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. According to the SEC, it has about half of the market as measured by assets under management. Its 140 financial advisers had sold more than $10 billion of proprietary, closed-end municipal bond funds to clients through the end of last year.
Meanwhile, the rest of the financial advice industry is watching the $70 billion Puerto Rico municipal debt market closely. Regulators have begun making inquiries into mutual fund companies, including OppenheimerFunds Inc., in an attempt to understand their investors’ exposure to Puerto Rico municipal debt.
As of Wednesday, the S&P Municipal Bond Puerto Rico Index had declined 17.2% over the past 12-month period. Year-to-date, it is down 15%, with the drop starting near the end of June, about a month before Detroit filed for bankruptcy.
“UBS Puerto Rico is pleased with [Tuesday’s] decision, which relates to a period of significant turmoil in the global financial markets between 2008 and 2009,” spokesman Gregg Rosenberg said in a statement. “As the firm has maintained since first disclosing this investigation in 2010, the allegations against Mr. Ferrer and Mr. Ortiz were meritless, and the judge’s decision confirms our position.”
One plaintiff’s attorney acknowledged the decision to be a victory for UBS, but he cautioned that attorneys filing arbitration claims on behalf of UBS clients who owned the closed-end bond funds and individual Puerto Rico municipal securities will focus on the specific transactions with UBS clients.
“It’s a win for UBS, no question, but the SEC complaint dealt only with misrepresentations and omissions,” said attorney Andrew Stoltmann. “Those are issues related to risk disclosure made to investors and has nothing to do with the suitability of transactions. That’s what every [Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.] arbitration claim will be about.”
Ms. Murray’s decision is weighty, at 95 pages. The hearing lasted 13 days, and a total of 29 witnesses testified, including brokers, clients, and two experts.
Some UBS clients had considerable exposure to the bond funds, according to the decision. One client, Carmen San Miguel, was 52 when she placed her retirement savings and funds from a severance package totaling $344,000 with UBS Financial Services Puerto Rico. Sixty-five percent, or $223,000, was invested in Puerto Rico fixed-income and bond funds.
One UBS adviser, Wilson D. Colberg-Trigo, was a top-producing rep with about $700 million in assets under management. The Puerto Rico bond funds were 50% or more of the assets held by about 164 of his 700 clients, according to the decision.
Mr. Stoltmann said the volume of information in the decision would, in the end, help attorneys seeking to file complaints against UBS.
“The decision provides a crystal-clear road map for discovery in the Finra claims,” he said. “The e-mails that are referenced, the names of the individual brokers and what the policies and procedures were at UBS — that sort of information is invaluable for those of us fashioning discovery requests.”
The concentration of the fund in Puerto Rico securities has been well- documented, as well as the leverage rates for each fund, Mr. Rosenberg said.
“Muni bonds and/or closed end funds have long been a suitable part of many Puerto Rico investors’ portfolios and matched their objectives,” he said. “Clients were aware of the concentration of assets in muni bonds or closed-end funds.”
The decision by Ms. Murray came the same day that UBS AG put a cost of $41 million on its brokerage’s bet on Puerto Rico.
In its third-quarter earnings report, UBS said it took a $20 million trading loss and $21 million in credit losses connected to loans that were backed by Puerto Rican municipal securities and “related funds.”
The posting on this site are mere OPINIONS and NOT statements of fact in any way whatsoever. The information should not be relied upon and there have been no findings made against the firms or individuals referenced on this site. In addition, this Blog is made available for educational purposes only and incorporates information from the web as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and Stoltmann Law Offices (10 S. LaSalle, Suite 3500, CHICAGO, IL 60010, 312.332.4200). The Blog opinions should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ADVERTISING AND IT IS NOT A NEWSPAPER ARTICLE OR POST FROM AN INDEPENDENT OR NON-BIASED, NEWS SITE, NEWS SOURCE OR NEWSPAPER.